Just the arguments: 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy
(Book)
Notes
Bruce, M., & Barbone, S. (2011). Just the arguments: 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation (style guide)Bruce, Michael and Steven. Barbone. 2011. Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities Citation (style guide)Bruce, Michael and Steven. Barbone, Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
MLA Citation (style guide)Bruce, Michael. and Steven Barbone. Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Record Information
Last Sierra Extract Time | Mar 22, 2024 07:30:07 PM |
---|---|
Last File Modification Time | Mar 22, 2024 07:30:22 PM |
Last Grouped Work Modification Time | Mar 22, 2024 07:30:13 PM |
MARC Record
LEADER | 08502cam a2200505 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 710045144 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20190430104403.0 | ||
008 | 110325s2011 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | |a 2011012212 | ||
015 | |a GBB168700|2 bnb | ||
016 | 7 | |a 015821158|2 Uk | |
019 | |a 751748656 | ||
020 | |a 9781444336375 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ||
020 | |a 1444336371 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ||
020 | |a 9781444336382 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
020 | |a 144433638X (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)710045144|z (OCoLC)751748656 | ||
039 | |a 334155|c TLC | ||
040 | |a DLC|b eng|c DLC|d YDX|d YDXCP|d SINLB|d CDX|d UKMGB|d VP@|d ORX|d BWX|d TLE|d CWS|d BDX|d GWC|d FM0|d CAA | ||
042 | |a pcc | ||
049 | |a CAAA | ||
050 | 0 | 0 | |a BD21|b .J87 2011 |
082 | 0 | 0 | |a 190|2 22 |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Just the arguments :|b 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy /|c edited by Michael Bruce and Steven Barbone. |
264 | 1 | |a Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. :|b Wiley-Blackwell,|c 2011. | |
300 | |a xiii, 409 pages ;|c 24 cm | ||
336 | |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a unmediated|b n|2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a volume|b nc|2 rdacarrier | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 | |g Part I.|t Philosophy of religion.|t Aquinas' five ways /|r Timothy J. Pawl --|t Contingency cosmological argument /|r Mark T. Nelson --|t Kalam argument for the existence of God /|r Harry Lesser --|t Ontological argument /|r Sara L. Uckelman --|t Pascal's wager /|r Leslie Burkholder --|t James' will to believe argument /|r A.T. Fyfe --|t Problem of evil /|r Michael Bruce and Steven Barbone --|t Free will defense to the problem of evil /|r Grant Sterling --|t St. Anselm on free choice and the power to sin /|r Julia Hermann --|t Hume's argument against miracles /|r Tommaso Piazza --|t Euthyphro dilemma /|r David Baggett --|t Nietzche's death of God /|r Tom Grimwood --|t Ockham's razor /|r Grant Sterling --|g Part II.|t Metaphysics.|t Parmenides' refutation of change /|r Adrian Bardon --|t McTaggart's argument against the reality of time /|r M. Joshua Mozersky --|t Berkeley's master argument for idealism /|r John M. DePoe --|t Kant's refutation of idealism /|r Adrian Bardon --|t Master argument of Diodorus Cronus /|r Ludger Jansen --|t Lewis' argument for possible worlds /|r David Vander Laan --|t A reductionist account of personal identity /|r Fauve Lybaert --|t Split-case arguments about personal identity /|r Ludger Jansen --|t Ship of Theseus /|r Ludger Jansen --|t Problem of temporary intrinsics /|r Montserrat Bordes --|t A modern modal argument for the soul /|r Rafal Urbaniak and Agnieszka Rostalska --|t Two arguments for the harmlessness of death.|t Epicurus' death is nothing to us argument /|r Steven Luper --|t Lucretius' symmetry argument /|r Nicolas Bommarito --|t Existence of forms : Plato's argument from the possibility of knowledge /|r Jurgis (George) Brakas --|t Plato, Aristotle, and the third man argument /|r Jurgis (George) Brakas --|t Logical monism /|r Luis Estrada-González --|t Maximality paradox /|r Nicola Ciprotti --|t An argument for free will /|r Gerald Harrison --|t Frankfurt's refutation of the principle of alternative possibilities /|r Gerald Harrison --|t Van Inwagen's consequence argument against compatibilism /|r Grant Sterling --|t Fatalism /|r Fernando Migura and Agustin Arrieta --|t Sartre's argument for freedom /|r Jeffrey Gordon --|g Part III.|t Epistomology.|t Cogito arguments of Descartes and Augustine.|t Descartes' cogito /|r Joyce Lazier --|t Augustine's "Si fallor, sum" argument (if I am mistaken, I exist) /|r Brett Gaul --|t Cartesian dreaming argument for external-world skepticism /|r Stephen Hetherington --|t Transparency of experience argument /|r Carlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez --|t Regress argument for skepticism /|r Scott Aikin --|t Moore's anti-skeptical arguments /|r Matthew Frise --|t Bias paradox /|r Deborah Heikes --|t Gettier's argument against the traditional account of knowledge /|r John M. DePoe --|t Putnam's argument against cultural imperialism /|r Maria Caamaño --|t Davidson on the very idea of a conceptual scheme /|r George Wrisley --|t Quine's two dogmas of empiricism /|r Robert Sinclair --|t Hume and the problem of induction.|t Hume's problem of induction /|r James E. Taylor --|t Hume's negative argument concerning induction /|r Stefanie Rocknak --|t Argument by analogy in Thales and Anaximenes /|r Giannis Stamatellos --|t Quine's epistemology naturalized /|r Robert Sinclair --|t Sellars and the myth of the given /|r Willem A. deVries --|t Sellars' "Rylean myth" /|r Willem A. deVries --|t Aristotle and the argument to end all arguments /|r Toni Vogel Carey --|g Part IV.|t Ethics.|t Justice brings happiness in Plato's Republic /|r Joshua I. Weinstein --|t Aristotle's function argument /|r Sean McAleer --|t Aristotle's argument that goods are irreducible /|r Jurgis (George) Brakas --|t Aristotle's argument for perfectionism /|r Eric J. Silverman --|t Categorical imperative as the source for morality /|r Joyce Lazier --|t Kant on why autonomy deserves respect /|r Mark Piper --|t Mill's proof of utilitarianism /|r A.T. Fyfe --|t Experience machine objection to hedonism /|r Dan Weijers --|t Error theory argument /|r Robert L. Muhlnickel --|t Moore's open question argument /|r Bruno Verbeek --|t Wolff's argument for the rejection of state authority /|r Ben Saunders --|t Nozick's taxation is forced labor argument /|r Jason Waller --|t Charity is obligatory /|r Joakim Sandberg --|t Repugnant conclusion /|r Joakim Sandberg --|t Taurek on numbers don't count /|r Ben Saunders --|t Parfit's leveling down argument against egalitarianism /|r Ben Saunders --|t Nozick's Wilt Chamberlain argument /|r Fabian Wendt --|t Liberal feminism /|r Julinna C. Oxley --|t Moral status of animals from marginal cases /|r Julia Tanner --|t Ethical vegetarianism argument /|r Robert L. Muhlnickel --|t Thomson and the famous violinist /|r Leslie Burkholder --|t Marquis and the immorality of abortion /|r Leslie Burkholder --|t Tooley on abortion and infanticide /|r Ben Saunders --|t Rachels on euthanasia /|r Leslie Burkholder --|g Part V.|t Philosophy of mind.|t Leibniz' argument for innate ideas /|r Byron Kaldis --|t Descartes' arguments for the mind-body distinction /|r Dale Jacquette --|t Princess Elisabeth and the mind-body problem /|r Jen McWeeny --|t Kripke's argument for mind-body property dualism /|r Dale Jacquette --|t Argument from mental causation for physicalism /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Davidson's argument for anomalous monism /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Putnam's multiple realization argument against type-physicalism /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Supervenience argument against non-reductive physicalism /|r Andrew Russo --|t Ryle's argument against Cartesian internalism /|r Agustin Arrieta and Fernando Migura --|t Jackson's knowledge argument /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Nagel's "what is it like to be a bat" argument against physicalism /|r Amy Kind --|t Chalmer's zombie argument /|r Amy Kind --|t Argument from revelation /|r Carlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez --|t Searle and the Chinese room argument /|r Leslie Burkholder --|g Part VI.|t Science and language.|t Sir Karl Popper's demarcation argument /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan --|t Kuhn's incommensurability arguments /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan and Michael Bruce --|t Putnam's no miracles argument /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan --|t Galileo's falling bodies /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan --|t Eliminative materialism /|r Charlotte Blease --|t Wittgenstein's private language argument /|r George Wrisley --|t Fodor's argument for linguistic nativism /|r Majid Amini --|t Fodor and the impossibility of learning /|r Majid Amini --|t Quine on the indeterminacy of translation /|r Robert Sinclair --|t Davidson's argument for the principle of charity /|r Maria Caamaño --|t Frege's argument for Platonism /|r Ivan Kasa --|t Mathematical Platonism /|r Nicolas Pain.|g Appendix A.|t Learning the logical lingo.|g Appendix B.|t Rules of inference and replacement. |
650 | 0 | |a Philosophy|v Introductions.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85100851 | |
700 | 1 | |a Bruce, Michael.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2018048509 | |
700 | 1 | |a Barbone, Steven.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nr94028631 | |
907 | |a .b64109446 | ||
936 | |a PR 756827701 | ||
948 | |a MARCIVE Comprehensive, in 2023.02 | ||
948 | |a MARCIVE Over, 05/2021 | ||
989 | |1 .i137487228|b 190801782169|d aigci|g -|m |h 0|x 0|t 0|i 0|j 333|k 210430|o -|a BD21|r .J87 2011 | ||
994 | |a 02|b CAA | ||
995 | |a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2023.02 | ||
995 | |a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2021.05 | ||
995 | |a Loaded with m2btab.migrate in 2021.04 | ||
998 | |e -|f eng|a ai |