New! Our library catalog now also shows items belonging to our partner libraries in the Marmot Library Network. You can place holds on most items from any library in the network and they will be sent to the Aims Learning Commons for you to pick up. Please know that it can take time to get items from other libraries, so plan accordingly.

The default for search results is ‘All Libraries’. Once you complete your initial search, you can limit to items belonging to Aims Kiefer Library by clicking on the ‘Aims Kiefer Library’, ‘On Shelf', or ‘Online Resources’ tabs below the search box.

To see what TEXTBOOKS the library has for a specific class, use the search box below and change the last dropdown box to either ‘in Course Reserves by Name or Number’ or ‘in Course Reserves by Instructor’. 

Just the arguments: 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy

Book Cover
Average Rating
Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. : Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
9781444336375 (hardcover : alk. paper), 1444336371 (hardcover : alk. paper), 9781444336382 (pbk. : alk. paper), 144433638X (pbk. : alk. paper)
Physical Desc:
xiii, 409 pages ; 24 cm
Aims Greeley Circulation
BD21 .J87 2011
Description not provided
Also in This Series
Call Number
Aims Greeley Circulation
BD21 .J87 2011
On Shelf
More Like This
More Copies In Prospector
Loading Prospector Copies...
More Details


Includes bibliographical references and index.
APA Citation (style guide)

Bruce, M., & Barbone, S. (2011). Just the arguments: 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation (style guide)

Bruce, Michael and Steven. Barbone. 2011. Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities Citation (style guide)

Bruce, Michael and Steven. Barbone, Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

MLA Citation (style guide)

Bruce, Michael. and Steven Barbone. Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

Note! Citation formats are based on standards as of July 2022. Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID:
Go To GroupedWork

Record Information

Last Sierra Extract TimeNov 08, 2022 06:14:50 PM
Last File Modification TimeNov 08, 2022 06:15:23 PM
Last Grouped Work Modification TimeNov 08, 2022 06:14:59 PM

MARC Record

LEADER08397cam a2200481 a 4500
008110325s2011    enk      b    001 0 eng  
010 |a 2011012212
015 |a GBB168700|2 bnb
0167 |a 015821158|2 Uk
019 |a 751748656
020 |a 9781444336375 (hardcover : alk. paper)
020 |a 1444336371 (hardcover : alk. paper)
020 |a 9781444336382 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 |a 144433638X (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 |a (OCoLC)710045144|z (OCoLC)751748656
039 |a 334155|c TLC
040 |a DLC|b eng|c DLC|d YDX|d YDXCP|d SINLB|d CDX|d UKMGB|d VP@|d ORX|d BWX|d TLE|d CWS|d BDX|d GWC|d FM0|d CAA
042 |a pcc
049 |a CAAA
05000|a BD21|b .J87 2011
08200|a 190|2 22
24500|a Just the arguments :|b 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy /|c edited by Michael Bruce and Steven Barbone.
264 1|a Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. :|b Wiley-Blackwell,|c 2011.
300 |a xiii, 409 pages ;|c 24 cm
336 |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent
337 |a unmediated|b n|2 rdamedia
338 |a volume|b nc|2 rdacarrier
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index.
50500|g Part I.|t Philosophy of religion.|t Aquinas' five ways /|r Timothy J. Pawl --|t Contingency cosmological argument /|r Mark T. Nelson --|t Kalam argument for the existence of God /|r Harry Lesser --|t Ontological argument /|r Sara L. Uckelman --|t Pascal's wager /|r Leslie Burkholder --|t James' will to believe argument /|r A.T. Fyfe --|t Problem of evil /|r Michael Bruce and Steven Barbone --|t Free will defense to the problem of evil /|r Grant Sterling --|t St. Anselm on free choice and the power to sin /|r Julia Hermann --|t Hume's argument against miracles /|r Tommaso Piazza --|t Euthyphro dilemma /|r David Baggett --|t Nietzche's death of God /|r Tom Grimwood --|t Ockham's razor /|r Grant Sterling --|g Part II.|t Metaphysics.|t Parmenides' refutation of change /|r Adrian Bardon --|t McTaggart's argument against the reality of time /|r M. Joshua Mozersky --|t Berkeley's master argument for idealism /|r John M. DePoe --|t Kant's refutation of idealism /|r Adrian Bardon --|t Master argument of Diodorus Cronus /|r Ludger Jansen --|t Lewis' argument for possible worlds /|r David Vander Laan --|t A reductionist account of personal identity /|r Fauve Lybaert --|t Split-case arguments about personal identity /|r Ludger Jansen --|t Ship of Theseus /|r Ludger Jansen --|t Problem of temporary intrinsics /|r Montserrat Bordes --|t A modern modal argument for the soul /|r Rafal Urbaniak and Agnieszka Rostalska --|t Two arguments for the harmlessness of death.|t Epicurus' death is nothing to us argument /|r Steven Luper --|t Lucretius' symmetry argument /|r Nicolas Bommarito --|t Existence of forms : Plato's argument from the possibility of knowledge /|r Jurgis (George) Brakas --|t Plato, Aristotle, and the third man argument /|r Jurgis (George) Brakas --|t Logical monism /|r Luis Estrada-González --|t Maximality paradox /|r Nicola Ciprotti --|t An argument for free will /|r Gerald Harrison --|t Frankfurt's refutation of the principle of alternative possibilities /|r Gerald Harrison --|t Van Inwagen's consequence argument against compatibilism /|r Grant Sterling --|t Fatalism /|r Fernando Migura and Agustin Arrieta --|t Sartre's argument for freedom /|r Jeffrey Gordon --|g Part III.|t Epistomology.|t Cogito arguments of Descartes and Augustine.|t Descartes' cogito /|r Joyce Lazier --|t Augustine's "Si fallor, sum" argument (if I am mistaken, I exist) /|r Brett Gaul --|t Cartesian dreaming argument for external-world skepticism /|r Stephen Hetherington --|t Transparency of experience argument /|r Carlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez --|t Regress argument for skepticism /|r Scott Aikin --|t Moore's anti-skeptical arguments /|r Matthew Frise --|t Bias paradox /|r Deborah Heikes --|t Gettier's argument against the traditional account of knowledge /|r John M. DePoe --|t Putnam's argument against cultural imperialism /|r Maria Caamaño --|t Davidson on the very idea of a conceptual scheme /|r George Wrisley --|t Quine's two dogmas of empiricism /|r Robert Sinclair --|t Hume and the problem of induction.|t Hume's problem of induction /|r James E. Taylor --|t Hume's negative argument concerning induction /|r Stefanie Rocknak --|t Argument by analogy in Thales and Anaximenes /|r Giannis Stamatellos --|t Quine's epistemology naturalized /|r Robert Sinclair --|t Sellars and the myth of the given /|r Willem A. deVries --|t Sellars' "Rylean myth" /|r Willem A. deVries --|t Aristotle and the argument to end all arguments /|r Toni Vogel Carey --|g Part IV.|t Ethics.|t Justice brings happiness in Plato's Republic /|r Joshua I. Weinstein --|t Aristotle's function argument /|r Sean McAleer --|t Aristotle's argument that goods are irreducible /|r Jurgis (George) Brakas --|t Aristotle's argument for perfectionism /|r Eric J. Silverman --|t Categorical imperative as the source for morality /|r Joyce Lazier --|t Kant on why autonomy deserves respect /|r Mark Piper --|t Mill's proof of utilitarianism /|r A.T. Fyfe --|t Experience machine objection to hedonism /|r Dan Weijers --|t Error theory argument /|r Robert L. Muhlnickel --|t Moore's open question argument /|r Bruno Verbeek --|t Wolff's argument for the rejection of state authority /|r Ben Saunders --|t Nozick's taxation is forced labor argument /|r Jason Waller --|t Charity is obligatory /|r Joakim Sandberg --|t Repugnant conclusion /|r Joakim Sandberg --|t Taurek on numbers don't count /|r Ben Saunders --|t Parfit's leveling down argument against egalitarianism /|r Ben Saunders --|t Nozick's Wilt Chamberlain argument /|r Fabian Wendt --|t Liberal feminism /|r Julinna C. Oxley --|t Moral status of animals from marginal cases /|r Julia Tanner --|t Ethical vegetarianism argument /|r Robert L. Muhlnickel --|t Thomson and the famous violinist /|r Leslie Burkholder --|t Marquis and the immorality of abortion /|r Leslie Burkholder --|t Tooley on abortion and infanticide /|r Ben Saunders --|t Rachels on euthanasia /|r Leslie Burkholder --|g Part V.|t Philosophy of mind.|t Leibniz' argument for innate ideas /|r Byron Kaldis --|t Descartes' arguments for the mind-body distinction /|r Dale Jacquette --|t Princess Elisabeth and the mind-body problem /|r Jen McWeeny --|t Kripke's argument for mind-body property dualism /|r Dale Jacquette --|t Argument from mental causation for physicalism /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Davidson's argument for anomalous monism /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Putnam's multiple realization argument against type-physicalism /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Supervenience argument against non-reductive physicalism /|r Andrew Russo --|t Ryle's argument against Cartesian internalism /|r Agustin Arrieta and Fernando Migura --|t Jackson's knowledge argument /|r Amir Horowitz --|t Nagel's "what is it like to be a bat" argument against physicalism /|r Amy Kind --|t Chalmer's zombie argument /|r Amy Kind --|t Argument from revelation /|r Carlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez --|t Searle and the Chinese room argument /|r Leslie Burkholder --|g Part VI.|t Science and language.|t Sir Karl Popper's demarcation argument /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan --|t Kuhn's incommensurability arguments /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan and Michael Bruce --|t Putnam's no miracles argument /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan --|t Galileo's falling bodies /|r Liz Stillwaggon Swan --|t Eliminative materialism /|r Charlotte Blease --|t Wittgenstein's private language argument /|r George Wrisley --|t Fodor's argument for linguistic nativism /|r Majid Amini --|t Fodor and the impossibility of learning /|r Majid Amini --|t Quine on the indeterminacy of translation /|r Robert Sinclair --|t Davidson's argument for the principle of charity /|r Maria Caamaño --|t Frege's argument for Platonism /|r Ivan Kasa --|t Mathematical Platonism /|r Nicolas Pain.|g Appendix A.|t Learning the logical lingo.|g Appendix B.|t Rules of inference and replacement.
650 0|a Philosophy|v Introductions.|0
7001 |a Bruce, Michael.|0
7001 |a Barbone, Steven.|0
907 |a .b64109446
936 |a PR 756827701
948 |a MARCIVE Over, 05/2021
989 |1 .i137487228|b 190801782169|d aigci|g -|m |h 0|x 0|t 0|i 0|j 333|k 210430|o -|a BD21|r .J87 2011
994 |a 02|b CAA
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2021.05
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.migrate in 2021.04
998 |e -|f eng|a ai